11/29/2022 0 Comments Long wingspan![]() Traditionally, shooting ability is the most valued commodity in the NBA because the better shooting ability a team and its players have, the more efficient each shot and offense in general is. To try to further my exploration into the impact of players length on their jump shooting ability, I looked into whether or not this slight advantage in jump shooting ability that players with shorter wingspans relative to their height had led to improved offensive impact. As a result, only the upper tier of shooters, regardless of wingspan or length, have “long twos” in their shot diet and put up a reasonable volume of them.Thus, having overwhelmingly only the upper echelon of shooters in the population of the data might throw off the slight trend we had been seeing in the other shooting metrics. Though it is difficult to pinpoint why this is, one possible explanation is that because “long twos” are the most likely type of jump shot to be a pullup (off the dribble), unassisted, and self created caliber, only very good shooters are usually wanted and allowed to take these traditionally more difficult and less efficient shot (on a points per possession basis). This shooting metric was the only metric such that there was no slight “negative” correlation between “length” and long two shooting percentage in all five seasons of data looked at. However, for “long two” jump shots between 16 feet and the 3PT line, there was the least correlation of all the shooting metrics looked at. It is the closest statistic to a universal general shooting metric because it has the least amount of variation in the conditions of each attempt, making it the most reliable statistic. #LONG WINGSPAN FREE#Of all the relationships between a shooting metric and player “length”, free throw percentage was the strongest as they had the most “negative” and steep slope with an average yearly r-squared value of 0.01967599. In each of the five years included in the analysis, the regression line of the plot showed slightly negative correlation between “length” and free throw shooting percentages, meaning that in general the lesser a player’s length was, generally the better free throw shooter they were. Data was only used for players who shot 25 or more free throw attempts in their 500 or more minutes on the floor to filter out unreliably small sample sizes. When comparing shooting ability between players, the most equitable comparison is free throw shooting, where the distance and undefended nature of the shot remains constant, so the difficulty of the shot does not vary. Though it has been proved that in broad terms a jump shot with more arc will more often go in the hoop, and a player with longer arms could generate more power into a shot, shooting is all about accuracy not distance all about muscle memory and repeating a motion that works, which physically speaking is easier to do when the motion is quicker and more condensed, giving shorter armed players an advantage. In golf, longer arms and thus a “longer swing” can more easily lead to less control of where the ball will be hit due to the idea that the more parts and pieces there are to a swing, the more that can go wrong, thus a more condense swing is more consistent and reliable. However, the logic still applies and follows such that a player with longer arms and a longer swing might be able to hit the ball with more power, yet have less control than a player with a shorter swing and wingspan. When considering other sports such as golf, this sport has a swinging motion rather than shooting motions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |